The Gupta family is going through another round of accusation, after the Deputy Finance Minister Mcebisi Jonas responded strongly to an affidavit, revealing the various moves by Ajay Gupta to create a financial warchest for the family, using government officials.
Jonas response are quite mind-boggling and expository, judging from the minute details he released into the document.
Jonas filed an 11-page affidavit on Thursday whereby‚ paragraph by paragraph‚ he responded to Gupta’s own affidavit in which it was vehemently denied these events took place.
In the affidavit filed on February 9‚ Gupta had‚ under oath‚ denied meeting or speaking to Jonas.
“The correct facts regarding Mr Ajay Gupta himself is‚ in short‚ as follows. I met him at his Saxonwold residence on 23 October 2015 together with Mr Duduzane Zuma and Hlongwane‚” said Jonas‚ referring to businessman Fana Hlongwane.
The affidavit continues: “Mr Gupta indicated to me that ‘we’ – I understood clearly‚ the Gupta family and its interests had been gathering intelligence on me including those closest to me‚ they were aware of my activities and connections with senior members of the African National Congress‚ they are going to make me the Minister of Finance.
“Collectively as a family they make a lot of money from the state; that they intend to increase that to about R8-billion from about R6-billion currently and that the bulk of their money is stashed in Dubai‚” Jonas said.
He claimed Gupta revealed that the National Treasury had been a “stumbling block” to their ambitions.
Allegations that Jonas met Gupta were detailed in Public Protector Thuli Madonsela’s report on state capture. The report had been prepared by Madonsela during her time in office but was released by her successor‚ Busisiwe Mkhwebane‚ in November last year.
In the affidavit‚ Jonas highlighted that Madonsela had accepted his version of events and did not question his integrity.
“The Public Protector did not doubt my version. She did‚ however‚ record that Mr Gupta denies visits of an identified individual to his residence‚ despite the fact that telephone records reflected numerous visits by this person to Saxonwold‚” Jonas said.
He rejected Gupta’s version that he had been blatantly dishonest about the incident.
Ajay Gupta said to support his denial of meeting Jonas‚ he approached Duduzane Zuma and Fana Hlongwane to depose affidavits regarding his involvement at the meeting in October 2015.
Both businessmen‚ in separate affidavits‚ said Ajay Gupta was not present at any time during the meeting with Jonas held “on 25 October 2017” [sic].
Jonas maintained that the meeting took place on the October 23 2015 and not on October 25 2015‚ as stated by Hlongwane and Zuma.
“Therefore‚ the absence of Mr Ajay Gupta at a meeting two days later‚ on 25 October 2015‚ fails to confirm the necessary allegation‚” he said.
The above are the sequential response of Jonas in the affidavit.